Skip to main content

#Maldives: Vice President Dr. Waheed proposes solution which obstructs justice

The strong arms of the West-US partnership reached out into the ongoing political drama in the Maldives by positioning their agent, Vice President Dr. Mohamed Waheed Hassan in the role of moderator in the ongoing constitutional deadlock between the Executive and the Judiciary in the Maldives.

Dr. Waheed has remained a silent confederate of President Nasheed in the numerous instances of unconstitutional and immoral practices by the President and his Administration, that caused injury to public welfare and the interests of the State.

Two days ago Dr. Waheed broke his long silence and started giving interviews in international media against President Nasheed's unconstitutional actions against the Judiciary and political opposition.

In an interview to local media at his office today, Dr. Waheed attempted to position himself as the savior of the Republic by offering some hope for a viable solution to ‘situation catch-22’ between the Executive and the Judiciary. Dr. Waheed suggested to media to suspend Senior Judge Abdullah Mohamed from the judicial bench until the controversies around the judge are judiciously resolved.

However, Dr. Waheed’s recommended solution is deeply unjust to the Judiciary and to Judge Abdulla personally, in a case where clearly President Nasheed has contravened the constitution and laws while Judge Abdulla’s contraventions are mere allegations at this stage. Nasheed’s violations of constitution and law have been publicly stated by the country’s top lawyers such as the Prosecutor General Ahmed Muizzu, and not just by the Judiciary.

Hence, if Judge Abdulla is to be suspended in order to investigate the allegations against him by President Nasheed, then Nasheed, his Defence Minister Tholhath Ibrahim (DIK) and Home Minister Hassan Afeef, and his top military and police brass must also be suspended if the matter of Judge Abdulla's unconstitutional detention is investigated and adjudicated in a just and equitable way.

Leaving aside the question of who did what illegally, it boggles the mind to even think that any individual or group of individuals can impartially and independently adjudicate on the matter, in a country where such individuals are liable to be taken to military detention and solitary confinement should their deliberations or rulings displease President Nasheed.

Nasheed's unconstitutional arrest of Judge Abdulla contravenes basic human rights of every Maldivian. By denying Judge Abdulla his constitutional rights, the Executive is denying the rights of all Maldivians.

By arresting Judge Abdulla for his ruling ordering the release of opposition politician Dr. Mohamed Jameel Ahmed from illegal detention, President Nasheed has publicly demonstrated that he will interfere with the Judiciary at will should a Judicial ruling not be in his favor.

In reality, by proposing a solution which is unjust to every Maldivian citizen and not just Judge Abdulla, Dr. Waheed is obstructing Prosecutor General Muizzu from discharging his duties. Dr. Waheed is also undermining the independence of the Judiciary and Judicial Services Commission by indirectly suggesting that President Nasheed’s military arrest of Judge Abdulla is both legal and justified.

Popular posts from this blog

#Maldives: 24 years after Nov 3 massacre: Are the terrorists back masquerading as a political party? Part 1

#Maldives: November 3rd, 2012 marks the 24th anniversary of the bloody massacre that left the blackest of stains on Maldivian hearts and history. Nineteen innocent Maldivians were slaughtered and several injured. Hundreds were held at gunpoint for hours, many later taken away as hostages. Immense damage was given to public and private property. Maldives was rescued by troops sent by Indian Premier Rajiv Gandhi. The leader of the failed coup was a man called Sikka Ahmed Ismail Maniku, a man who had previous convictions for coup attempts against previous governments. The coup leader's nephew, Mohamed Nasheed, was installed as President in 2008, at the head of a political party whose top leadership comprised of family members and others involved in the 1988 November 3 massacre.

Nasheed's cabinet, senior political advisors and state ministers included terrorists convicted for their involvement in the November 3 massacre. As Nasheed denounces the current government of Dr. Mohamed W…

#Maldives: A Victim of Indian Foreign Policy? Nov 3, 1988 terrorist attack and GMR in perspective.

#Maldives: As November 3, 2012, the 24th anniversary of the terrorist attack on Maldives approaches, public sentiment against the Indian multinational GMR's lease of the Maldives' international airport has gained momentum. Inflammatory speeches by local politicians and local media reports associate the GMR-MACL lease agreement on a scale with the November 3rd 1988 terrorist attack. The 1988 terror attack was by a group of Maldivians headed by Sikka Ahmed Ismail Maniku (uncle of former President Nasheed) who brought 80 Tamil mercenaries to overthrow the government of the time. India's role then was that of the knight in shining armor, the Indian military and navy charging to the rescue in Operation Cactus. Nineteen people were killed in the terror attack.

Amidst the increasingly strident calls on the Maldivian Government to "throw GMR out" and to recapture the "Maldivians' airport for Maldivians", Maldivian commentators on social media question the I…

The Quality of Political Appointees in the Nasheed Administration

As almost seven months pass since President Mohamed Nasheed took power in the Maldives, Maldivian citizens despair of ever seeing the much promised improvements in their livelihoods. The state treasury has been exhausted within this brief period, and the economy has declined to an extent worse than the aftermath of the 2004 Asian Tsunami. Escalating price of consumer goods, collapse of social services, increasing food insecurity and declining real income have thrown more people below the poverty line. While President Nasheed is engrossed in his hate and persecution campaign against political opponents, his government has ground to a halt.

The Nasheed administration came into power promising reduced expenditures, increased government revenue and a clamp down on corruption in top government circles. President Nasheed’s first budget (2009) has a 7 billion deficit (nearly 5 billion more than the previous administration’s last budget, and government revenue has fallen by more than 28% since…